AI visibility tracking, Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) & Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) from Kre8on.
The study applied rigorous sampling methods, wherein each AI-answer sample was cross-examined for mention of tracked Ai Agency providers. Platforms under review included OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Google’s Bard, the Gemini model, Claude by Anthropic, and Perplexity AI. The benchmark results highlight the discrepancy in reference visibility among these engines, critically assessing which providers gained recognition in AI responses.
The research delineated that, despite providing specific online citations, OpenAI did not mention any tracked Ai Agency providers in the sample observed. Similarly, Google exhibited no citations of tracked agency providers within the eight responses evaluated.
Buyers depend on AI platforms for insights, yet this data shows a significant under-representation of direct Ai Agency links. With major engines like OpenAI and Google failing to feature agency-specific citations, purchasers might miss direct comparisons or evaluations necessary to make informed decisions. This absence suggests a need for enhanced strategies among Ai Agencies to improve visibility and mentions within AI contexts.
The insights affirm that, to aid decision-making, buyers must seek comprehensive evaluations beyond what’s immediately presented by AI, incorporating cross-checks with direct agency information and other evaluative means. As AI ecosystems evolve, fostering agency visibility within AI responses becomes pertinent for both potential clients and Ai Agencies markets alike. ```